If you are having trouble viewing this newsletter, click here or copy and paste this address in your web browser address bar: http://www.defendmarriage.org/defendmarriage/newsletters/0034.html

 
 
     
 

Special Issue
September 30, 2004


House Vote Falls Short—But We Are Making Progress!

Dear Defender of Marriage,

Richard Wilkins, Chairman, Defend Marriage The United States House of Representatives voted 227 to 186 today, Thursday, September 30, for the Federal Marriage Amendment -- 61 votes short of the required two-thirds majority needed to send the amendment on to the Senate. The House vote tally is set out below.

With just one month to go before the election, it has been clear for weeks that -- even if the House passed the amendment -- the Senate would not be able to act before adjourning. This may be just as well, since in July the Senate did not muster enough political will to even call for a formal vote on the amendment. As a result, the amendment process must begin again in January when the 109th Congress convenes.

As with the Senate “non-action” in July, we should not look at the House vote as a defeat. While all of us wish both the House and the Senate had sent the amendment on to the states for ratification, we are making real progress:

  • It is a major accomplishment to even get a constitutional amendment to a floor vote in either the House or the Senate; it simply doesn’t happen that often.
  • The Senate and House debates have educated millions of Americans about the need for a constitutional amendment to protect marriage.
  • By forcing our elected representatives to go on the record, we have a clearer picture regarding which politicians truly support marriage and the family.

Now is the time to do the most important work in the effort to defend marriage. Between now and Election Day, there are two clear messages that must be sent: one to federal politicians and one to state courts.

The federal message: Every American who believes that the family is the fundamental unit of society must cast their votes carefully and wisely. The 109th Congress must be sent to Washington with the clear message that marriage between a man and a woman matters.

The state message: State courts, like their federal counterparts, have been busily redefining marriage – as decisions in Hawaii, Alaska, Vermont, Massachusetts and Washington attest. Voters in Hawaii, Alaska and other states (most recently, Louisiana) have already amended their constitutions to restore marriage; a similar process is underway in Massachusetts.

On November 2, 11 more states will have marriage amendments on their ballots. Homosexual advocates (with the full support of established media outlets) are outspending marriage defenders by astonishing margins. They are making distressing progress with the flimsy claim that any protection of marriage “goes too far.” These advocates must not succeed. If your state has a marriage initiative on the ballot, please support its passage with your time, energy and money. Let your voice be heard. On November 2, these states must send the unmistakable message that it is not “going too far” to safeguard the right of children to both a father and a mother.

In the closing moments of the House debate, House Majority Leader Tom DeLay affirmed that “we will take it from here and we're going to come back and we're going to come back and we will never give up. We're going to protect marriage in this country."

He is right.

We have no other choice if we care about our children’s future.

My thanks to all of you who are doing so much to defend marriage. Now, let us renew our efforts in this most valiant of all good fights.

Sincerely,

Richard G Wilkins
Chairman


FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 484

(Republicans in roman; Democrats in italic; Independents underlined)

H J RES 106 2/3 YEA-AND-NAY 30-Sep-2004 5:25 PM
QUESTION: On Passage
BILL TITLE: Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to marriage

  Yeas Nays PRES NV
Republican 191 27   9
Democratic 36 158   11
Independent   1    
TOTALS 227 186   20

---- YEAS 227 ---

Aderholt
Akin
Alexander
Bachus
Baker
Ballenger
Barrett (SC)
Bartlett (MD)
Barton (TX)
Beauprez
Berry
Bilirakis
Bishop (GA)
Bishop (UT)
Blackburn
Blunt
Boehner
Bonilla
Bonner
Boozman
Boucher
Boyd

Bradley (NH)
Brady (TX)
Brown (SC)
Brown-Waite, Ginny
Burgess
Burns
Burr
Burton (IN)
Buyer
Calvert
Camp
Cantor
Capito
Carson (OK)
Carter
Chabot
Chandler
Chocola
Coble
Cole
Collins
Cooper
Costello
Cramer

Crane
Crenshaw
Cubin
Culberson
Cunningham
Davis (AL)
Davis (TN)

Davis, Jo Ann
Davis, Tom
Deal (GA)
DeLay
DeMint
Doolittle
Duncan
Edwards
Ehlers
Emerson
English
Etheridge
Everett
Feeney
Ferguson
Flake
Forbes
Ford
Fossella
Franks (AZ)
Gallegly
Garrett (NJ)
Gillmor
Gingrey
Goode
Goodlatte
Gordon
Granger
Graves
Green (WI)
Gutknecht
Hall
Harris
Hart
Hastert
Hastings (WA)
Hayes
Hayworth
Hefley
Hensarling
Herger
Herseth
Hoekstra
Holden
Hulshof
Hyde
Isakson
Issa
Istook
Jefferson
Jenkins
John
Johnson (IL)
Johnson, Sam
Jones (NC)
Keller
Kelly
Kennedy (MN)
King (IA)
King (NY)
Kingston
Kline
LaHood
Lampson
Latham
LaTourette
Lewis (CA)
Lewis (KY)
Linder
LoBiondo
Lucas (KY)
Lucas (OK)
Manzullo
Marshall
Matheson

McCotter
McCrery
McHugh
McIntyre
McKeon
Mica
Miller (FL)
Miller (MI)
Miller, Gary
Moran (KS)
Murphy
Musgrave
Myrick
Neugebauer
Ney
Northup
Norwood
Nunes
Nussle
Ortiz
Osborne
Otter
Oxley
Pearce
Pence
Peterson (MN)
Peterson (PA)
Petri
Pickering
Pitts
Platts
Pombo
Porter
Portman
Putnam
Quinn
Radanovich
Rahall
Ramstad
Regula
Rehberg
Renzi
Reynolds
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rogers (MI)
Rohrabacher
Ross
Royce
Ryan (WI)
Ryun (KS)
Sandlin
Saxton
Schrock
Scott (GA)
Sensenbrenner
Sessions
Shadegg
Shaw
Sherwood
Shimkus
Shuster
Simpson
Skelton
Smith (MI)
Smith (NJ)
Smith (TX)
Souder
Spratt
Stearns
Stenholm
Sullivan
Tancredo
Tanner
Taylor (MS)

Taylor (NC)
Terry
Thomas
Thompson (MS)
Thornberry
Tiahrt
Tiberi
Toomey
Turner (OH)
Upton
Vitter
Walden (OR)
Walsh
Wamp
Weldon (FL)
Weldon (PA)
Weller
Whitfield
Wicker
Wilson (NM)
Wilson (SC)
Wolf
Young (AK)
Young (FL)

---- NAYS 186 ---

Abercrombie
Ackerman
Allen
Andrews
Baca
Baird
Baldwin

Bass
Becerra
Bell
Berkley
Berman
Biggert
Bishop (NY)
Blumenauer

Bono
Boswell
Brady (PA)
Brown (OH)
Butterfield
Capps
Capuano
Cardin
Cardoza
Carson (IN)
Case

Castle
Clay
Clyburn
Conyers

Cox
Crowley
Cummings
Davis (CA)
Davis (FL)
DeFazio
DeGette
Delahunt
DeLauro
Deutsch
Dicks
Dingell
Doggett
Dooley (CA)
Doyle

Dreier
Emanuel
Engel
Eshoo
Evans
Farr
Fattah

Filner
Foley
Frank (MA)
Frelinghuysen
Frost
Gephardt

Gerlach
Gibbons
Gilchrest
Gonzalez
Green (TX)
Greenwood
Grijalva
Gutierrez
Hill
Hinchey
Hinojosa

Hobson
Hoeffel
Holt
Honda
Hooley (OR)

Hostettler
Houghton
Hoyer
Inslee
Israel
Jackson (IL)
Jackson-Lee (TX)

Johnson (CT)
Johnson, E. B.
Jones (OH)
Kanjorski
Kaptur
Kennedy (RI)
Kildee
Kilpatrick
Kind

Kirk
Kleczka
Knollenberg
Kolbe
Kucinich
Langevin
Lantos
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)

Leach
Lee
Levin
Lewis (GA)
Lipinski
Lofgren
Lowey
Lynch
Majette
Maloney
Markey
Matsui
McCarthy (MO)
McCarthy (NY)
McCollum
McDermott
McGovern

McInnis
McNulty
Meehan
Michaud
Millender-McDonald
Miller (NC)
Miller, George
Mollohan
Moore
Moran (VA)
Nadler
Napolitano
Neal (MA)
Obey
Olver

Ose
Owens
Pallone
Pascrell
Pastor

Paul
Payne
Pelosi
Pomeroy
Price (NC)
Pryce (OH)
Rodriguez
Rothman
Roybal-Allard
Ruppersberger
Rush
Ryan (OH)
Sabo
Sánchez, Linda T.
Sanchez, Loretta

Sanders
Schakowsky
Schiff
Scott (VA)
Serrano

Shays
Sherman
Simmons
Slaughter
Smith (WA)
Snyder
Solis
Stark
Strickland
Stupak

Sweeney
Tauscher
Thompson (CA)
Tierney
Towns
Turner (TX)
Udall (CO)
Udall (NM)
Van Hollen
Velázquez
Visclosky
Waters
Watson
Watt
Waxman
Weiner
Wexler
Woolsey
Wu
Wynn

---- NOT VOTING 20 ---

Boehlert
Brown, Corrine
Cannon
Davis (IL)
Diaz-Balart, L.
Diaz-Balart, M.
Dunn
Harman
Hastings (FL)

Hunter
Meek (FL)
Meeks (NY)
Menendez
Murtha

Nethercutt
Oberstar
Rangel
Reyes

Ros-Lehtinen
Tauzin

 

Please Contribute to Defend Marriage

Please consider making as generous a contribution as you can to defend marriage and the family. Defend Marriage is a project of United Families International (UFI), a 501 (c )(3) organization, so your contribution is tax deductible.

If you would like to designate your contribution to UFI to go entirely to the Defend Marriage Project, you can easily do so by making a contribution that ends with 4 cents, i.e. $25.04, $173.04, $1,000,000.04 and so on. That will automatically flag it to be applied entirely to Defend Marriage. You can easily and securely make a contribution online or print out a form to mail in a contribution.

Thank you in advance for your generous support!


Want to help even more?

Please forward this on to others who may be willing to help defend marriage and the family.


To unsubscribe, click here.
United Families International PO Box 2630 Gilbert, AZ 85299-2630
Phone: (480) 632-5450 • FAX: (480) 892-4417

 
     
United Families International Sign the United States Petition to Defend Marriage!